Hereās whatās holding you back
Youāve weathered your fair share of ugly surprises, and multiple teammates taking time off at the same time was probably one of them.
More often than not, these situations are completely avoidable ā that is, if the person planning a break already knew who else would be on leave during their chosen dates. But whatāre the chances of that happening, right?
Hereās how weāre clearing the way
Weāve felt that pain, so we built to solve it.
The Leave Conflicts feature helps high trust teams plan their work better by preemptively catching conflicts before they wreak havoc.
In the case of unavoidable overlaps, like multiple people on sick leave, the feature keeps team managers aware of ugly surprises around the corner.
And finally, it dishes responsibility onto everyoneās platesānot just the managerāsābecause weāre all adults and can make our own decisions.
Behind the scenes
We pride ourselves on making software obvious. That involves building thoughtfully and doing all the heavy lifting so that, for our users, using Pause is a breeze.
Hereās a glimpse at the principles that guided us and how we made the Leaves Conflict feature a no-brainer.

Dispense just enough information at just the right time
We donāt bombard our users with information they donāt need. We surface leave conflicts only when and where theyāre necessary. In this case, that’s when users choose their dates and we discover that someone from their team is also on a break during the same timeframe. We trim the excess, they plan better.
Support good decisions through collaboration
By disclosing leave conflicts to both managers and team members, we equalise the burden of decision-making and enable conversations between colleagues that deepen empathy, if there is some already. We also make no room for playing the blame game because having leave information at their fingertips means thereās no reason for users to be unaware.
Create information, not restriction
By ensuring that the least powerful actor ā the employee ā doesnāt get penalised by the system, weāve built Pause for openness and equality. We havenāt given approvers the authority to block multiple people from taking time off together, and we never will.
If people know that their team might go under capacity and still take time off, itās for one of two reasons. One, because theyāre in an unavoidable bind (and hey, emergencies occur). Or two, theyāre subtly reflecting a lack of care for the āteamā in āteamworkā.
But software canāt solve whatās broken by culture. To believe our small piece of tech can change inconsiderate behaviour is delusional, which weād like to believe we arenāt.